https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/favicon.ico?17011170022015-10-17T17:35:25ZOpen Information Security FoundationSuricata - Bug #1556: MTU setting on NIC interface not considered by af-packethttps://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1556?journal_id=55952015-10-17T17:35:25ZAlexander Gozman
<ul></ul><p>Maybe it's not a bug but a feature? ;) Is default-packet-size specified in suricata's configuration file? AFAIK suricata checks MTU only if default-packet-size is 0 or unspecified.</p> Suricata - Bug #1556: MTU setting on NIC interface not considered by af-packethttps://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1556?journal_id=56282015-11-03T02:50:47ZEric Leblonderic@regit.org
<ul></ul><p>It works for me (tm) using latest git and when specifying the iface on the command line. But when you have two ifaces you need to setup default-packet-size to the max value or value of first iface will be used. I will submit a PR to improve that.</p> Suricata - Bug #1556: MTU setting on NIC interface not considered by af-packethttps://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1556?journal_id=56622015-11-17T15:48:41ZEric Leblonderic@regit.org
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Closed</i></li></ul><p>Improvement implemented by <a class="external" href="https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/pull/1733">https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/pull/1733</a></p> Suricata - Bug #1556: MTU setting on NIC interface not considered by af-packethttps://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1556?journal_id=80082017-03-19T20:36:12ZKristopher Kolpin
<ul></ul><p>Please see the following issue at:</p>
<p><a class="external" href="https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/7388">https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/7388</a></p>