https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/favicon.ico?17011170022019-03-13T20:32:56ZOpen Information Security FoundationSuricata - Bug #2882: http keyword rule regression for bi-directional ruleshttps://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/2882?journal_id=115622019-03-13T20:32:56ZVictor Julienvictor@inliniac.net
<ul></ul><p>This was never supported. The only change in 4.1 is that the rule parser became stricter. In previous versions such rules may have worked by luck or by skipping certain conditions in their checks.</p> Suricata - Bug #2882: http keyword rule regression for bi-directional ruleshttps://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/2882?journal_id=121312019-05-23T21:35:36ZAndreas Herzoisf@herzandreas.de
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Derek Ditch</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>Support</i></li></ul><p>Do you need more feedback on that or is the response from Victor helpful?<br />If yes please close the issue :)</p> Suricata - Bug #2882: http keyword rule regression for bi-directional ruleshttps://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/2882?journal_id=121952019-05-24T05:01:46ZVictor Julienvictor@inliniac.net
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> deleted (<del><i>Derek Ditch</i></del>)</li><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>Support</i></del>)</li></ul>