https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/favicon.ico?17011170022012-12-07T09:10:48ZOpen Information Security FoundationSuricata - Bug #632: tcp.reassembly_memuse incorrectly reported https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/632?journal_id=26012012-12-07T09:10:48ZVictor Julienvictor@inliniac.net
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Assigned</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Anoop Saldanha</i></li></ul> Suricata - Bug #632: tcp.reassembly_memuse incorrectly reported https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/632?journal_id=35652013-10-26T10:21:10ZVictor Julienvictor@inliniac.net
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>TBD</i></li></ul> Suricata - Bug #632: tcp.reassembly_memuse incorrectly reported https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/632?journal_id=47922014-11-12T13:12:37ZKen Steeleken@tilera.com
<ul></ul><p>Now (suricat 2.0.x) stats.log reports the value of ra_memuse for each thread. So it is no longer summed incorrectly, but it no implies that threads * ra_memuse amount of memory is being used, which is wrong.</p> Suricata - Bug #632: tcp.reassembly_memuse incorrectly reported https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/632?journal_id=69812016-06-15T05:55:27ZVictor Julienvictor@inliniac.net
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Assigned</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> deleted (<del><i>Anoop Saldanha</i></del>)</li><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>TBD</i></del>)</li></ul><p>This has been addressed in 3.0 I believe.</p>