Security #2770
closedTCP FIN/ACK, RST/ACK in HTTP - detection bypass
d8634daf74c882356659addb65fb142b738a186b
Description
Hello, team!
During an investigation of this PCAP dump:
hxxps://www.joesandbox.com/analysis/95831/1/pcap (also attached as original.pcap)
an interesting problem has been found
Please, look at the Scapy script: poc.py
It's logic is:
- make a tcp 3whs with a server
- send a simple GET request to the server
- send a FIN/ACK packet just after previous query before a reply from the server will be received
- send a RST/ACK packet after the server replies to the GET request
You need to simulate a slow network connection, overload the HTTP server or use something more powerful than Python for the next important condition: FIN/ACK packet should be sent BEFORE a GET-response from the server will be received
After that let's test following rules on attached pcap dump poc.pcap:
alert tcp any any -> any any ( \
msg:"Test, tcp"; \
content:"GET"; \
pcre:"/index\.html/"; \
classtype:trojan-activity; \
sid:1; rev:1;)
alert http any any -> any any ( \
msg:"Test, http, no modifiers, no options"; \
content:"GET"; \
pcre:"/index\.html/"; \
classtype:trojan-activity; \
sid:2; rev:1;)
alert http any any -> any any ( \
msg:"Test, http, content modifier, no options"; \
content:"GET"; http_method; \
pcre:"/index\.html/"; \
classtype:trojan-activity; \
sid:3; rev:1;)
alert http any any -> any any ( \
msg:"Test, http, content modifier, pcre option"; \
content:"GET"; http_method; \
pcre:"/index\.html/U"; \
classtype:trojan-activity; \
sid:4; rev:1;)
We've used 4.0.3 and 4.1.2 Suricata versions. Here are results:
sid,4.0.3,4.1.2
sid:1,noalert,noalert
sid:2,noalert,noalert
sid:3,noalert,alert
sid:4,alert,alert
It's not strange that both versions detect a pcap with the most described rule (sid:4)
But both versions don't detect 'tcp' and 'http' rules without special modifiers or options
A situation with 'sid:3' is funny :-)
It's typical situation when you need to use 'content/pcre' in HTTP protocol without modifiers/options
If you'll make a HTTP query as described above - detection will be bypassed in some cases
Despite the fact that FIN/ACK and RST/ACK packets are wrong - the initial HTTP request will be successfully processed by a server
Could you confirm that?
Thank you
Sincerely yours, Alexey Vishnyakov
Files
Updated by Victor Julien almost 6 years ago
- Status changed from New to Assigned
- Assignee set to Victor Julien
Updated by Victor Julien almost 6 years ago
- Target version set to 4.1.3
Confirmed. The issue is that the RST packet is mishandled, leading to some stream data not being inspected properly. Currently testing a patch.
Updated by Victor Julien almost 6 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
- Priority changed from High to Normal
Updated by Victor Julien almost 6 years ago
- Copied to Bug #2825: TCP FIN/ACK, RST/ACK in HTTP - detection bypass (4.0.x) added
Updated by Victor Julien about 4 years ago
- Tracker changed from Bug to Security
- CVE set to 2019-1010279
- Git IDs updated (diff)