Shivani Bhardwaj
- Login: unixia
- Registered on: 09/29/2018
- Last sign in: 04/25/2024
Issues
open | closed | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Assigned issues | 52 | 352 | 404 |
Reported issues | 79 | 231 | 310 |
Projects
Project | Roles | Registered on |
---|---|---|
Suricata | Developer, OISF Team, OISF Manager | 08/17/2023 |
Suricata-Update | Developer, OISF Team, OISF Manager | 08/17/2023 |
Activity
04/26/2024
- 07:59 AM Suricata Bug #6989 (In Review): tls.random buffers don't work as expected
- 07:44 AM Suricata Bug #6989: tls.random buffers don't work as expected
- Hi @ishaughnessy@emergingthreats.net !
Thank you for the excellent report. It is indeed an issue. I have opened a ... - 05:35 AM Suricata Bug #6989 (Assigned): tls.random buffers don't work as expected
04/25/2024
- 02:34 PM Suricata Bug #6985 (In Review): base64: coverity dead code warning
- In Review PR: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/10957
- 01:41 PM Suricata Bug #6985 (In Review): base64: coverity dead code warning
- ...
- 12:19 PM Suricata Bug #6280: base64: don't accept = in the middle of a string
- This needs a decision. Our parser would accept such a string in all modes as the string does not have any non base64 ...
- 11:57 AM Suricata Bug #6964 (Closed): base64: consumed bytes are incorrectly set for different modes
- Closed by: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/10941
04/18/2024
- 10:05 AM Suricata Bug #6964 (In Review): base64: consumed bytes are incorrectly set for different modes
- In Review PR: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/10892
- 06:56 AM Suricata Bug #6964 (Closed): base64: consumed bytes are incorrectly set for different modes
- For example, given a string @0YPhA d H@ and an ample buffer size, consumed bytes should be 4 in RFC2045 mode as there...
04/17/2024
- 06:45 AM Suricata Optimization #6960: fuzz: target to test signatures compatibility
- > Was there a bug where one rule should have triggered but did not because some other rule was activated ?
This is...
Also available in: Atom