SB Shivani Bhardwaj
- Login: unixia
- Registered on: 09/29/2018
- Last sign in: 10/03/2026
Issues
| open | closed | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned issues | 41 | 446 | 487 |
| Reported issues | 77 | 319 | 396 |
Projects
| Project | Roles | Registered on |
|---|---|---|
| Suricata | Developer, OISF Team, OISF Manager | 08/17/2023 |
| Suricata-Update | Developer, OISF Team, OISF Manager | 08/17/2023 |
Activity
10/29/2026
- SB 02:05 AM Suricata Bug #4880 (Assigned): detect: hostbits and xbits rules incorrectly ordered
10/26/2026
- SB 04:44 AM Suricata Bug #9277: Suricata: PCRE2 match-call work-limit return code -47 (behavior question)
- Hello!
Thank you for all the questions. Just letting you know that questions are better asked and answered over our forum (more visibility, yay! :) ): https://forum.suricata.io/
Redmine is used better as a bug report/ticketing platform.
10/21/2026
- SB 05:22 AM Suricata Bug #9240 (In Review): dcerpc: broken stub_data reassembly makes multiple txs for same fragment
- In Review PR: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/16479
10/20/2026
- SB 09:28 AM Suricata Bug #9240 (Resolved): dcerpc: broken stub_data reassembly makes multiple txs for same fragment
- In DCERPC/TCP, broken stub_data reassembly ends up putting different fragments in different transactions.
- SB 09:03 AM Suricata Task #8692: tracking: detect: DCERPC keywords coverage
- Stuart DC wrote in #note-12:
> Hi @unixia, i believe dcerpc.flags should operate on reassembled PDUs.
Hi @stu4rt ! Thanks a lot for confirming. Could you please clarify in such a case when should a match happen?
1. if each of the r...
10/19/2026
- SB 02:05 AM Suricata Bug #9171 (In Review): detect/iponly: dotted netmask addresses match 0.0.0.0/N instead of network (8.0.x backport)
- In Review PR: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/16462
- SB 01:56 AM Suricata Bug #9166 (Resolved): detect/iponly: dotted netmask addresses match 0.0.0.0/N instead of network
10/10/2026
- SB 09:31 AM Suricata Bug #9184 (Assigned): dcerpc/tcp: evasion if a gap is received
10/09/2026
- SB 05:00 AM Suricata Bug #9170 (In Review): detect/iponly: threshold by_flow with a high count never alerts
- In Review PR: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/16415
- SB 04:58 AM Suricata Bug #9166: detect/iponly: dotted netmask addresses match 0.0.0.0/N instead of network
- Closed by PR: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/16414