Peter Manev
- Login: pevma
- Email: petermanev@gmail.com
- Registered on: 11/16/2010
- Last connection: 06/21/2022
Issues
open | closed | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Assigned issues | 20 | 50 | 70 |
Reported issues | 93 | 334 | 427 |
Projects
Project | Roles | Registered on |
---|---|---|
Suricata | Developer, OISF Team, OISF Manager | 04/06/2011 |
Suricata-Update | Developer, OISF Team, OISF Manager | 10/31/2017 |
Activity
06/01/2022
- 09:04 PM Suricata Bug #5378 (Closed): unused doc warnings on mingw64/windows compile
- ...
05/21/2022
- 07:46 AM Suricata Bug #5362: Suricata version is 6.0.4 on Ubuntu 22.04 "Jammy"
- It also seems suricata-update is a separate package in the Jammy imported deb pkg builds....
05/14/2022
- 01:43 PM Suricata Bug #5362: Suricata version is 6.0.4 on Ubuntu 22.04 "Jammy"
- Thank you for the update.
I will try to dig in a bit more.
Alternatively if needed you can remove the existing vers... - 01:06 PM Suricata Bug #5362: Suricata version is 6.0.4 on Ubuntu 22.04 "Jammy"
- What err do you get ?
05/13/2022
- 07:42 AM Suricata Bug #5362: Suricata version is 6.0.4 on Ubuntu 22.04 "Jammy"
- It seems in Jammy the pkg name is updated to have "1:" prepended.(which is different then the other pkg namings in Bi...
05/12/2022
- 11:31 AM Suricata Bug #5362: Suricata version is 6.0.4 on Ubuntu 22.04 "Jammy"
- I am not sure how this can happen.
The only way would be with the wrong tar.
I have uploaded anew build in our S...
05/11/2022
- 07:10 AM Suricata Bug #5360: Build with ebpf is failing
- This needs internal qa test.
Will add done
04/02/2022
- 07:41 AM Suricata Optimization #4651: malloc / memory handling improvement
- Just for info - this issue is actually less about using tcmalloc/jemalloc and more about finding out if something can...
03/25/2022
- 04:31 PM Suricata Bug #5208: DCERPC protocol detection when nested in SMB
- Yes I can confirm the same ,was testing it a few weeks back, forgot to put in an issue.
Related to https://redmine...
03/23/2022
- 11:10 AM Suricata Bug #4880: hostbits/xbits: treat hostbits and xbits differently in the rule ordering stage
- May be related to
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1399
Also available in: Atom