JF Juliana Fajardini Reichow
- Login: jufajardini
- Registered on: 10/11/2020
- Last sign in: 10/05/2026
Issues
| open | closed | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned issues | 63 | 216 | 279 |
| Reported issues | 179 | 297 | 476 |
Projects
| Project | Roles | Registered on |
|---|---|---|
| Suricata | Developer, OISF Team, OISF Manager | 10/13/2020 |
| Suricata-Update | Developer, OISF Team, OISF Manager | 10/13/2020 |
Activity
10/30/2026
- JF 02:01 PM Suricata Bug #9245 (In Review): SCFlowRunFinishCallbacks() not invoked when FlowWorker evicts a flow locally (CheckWorkQueue), unlike FlowRecycler and the emergency flow-reuse path
- PR for review: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/16534
I've requested the author to create a user here, so we can assign the ticket to them.
10/27/2026
- JF 05:51 PM Suricata Feature #9228 (In Review): QUIC: support concurrent handshakes within the same UDP flow
- PR for review: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/16526
- JF 01:28 PM Suricata Task #9286 (Resolved): firewall: remove 'experimental' wording
- Merged with https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/16523
10/26/2026
- JF 06:42 PM Suricata Task #9286 (In Review): firewall: remove 'experimental' wording
- PR for review: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/16519
- JF 06:34 PM Suricata Task #9286 (Closed): firewall: remove 'experimental' wording
- For 9, it won't be experimental. For 8, 'experimental' isn't exactly what we mean.
10/21/2026
- JF 07:35 PM Suricata Bug #4880 (Triaged): detect: hostbits and xbits rules incorrectly ordered
- SV tests: https://github.com/OISF/suricata-verify/pull/3472
- JF 07:30 PM Suricata Bug #4880: detect: hostbits and xbits rules incorrectly ordered
- Report from Claude (Opus 5.5):
# Rule ordering: xbits setters sort after readers
Found while writing SV test for #8459. Present on `main` (checked
2026-10-21). Independent of firewall mode.
## Symptom
Two TD rules matching the... - JF 06:57 PM Suricata Bug #4880: detect: hostbits and xbits rules incorrectly ordered
- Philippe Antoine wrote in #note-5:
> Is this still an issue in Suricata 8 ? Would you have a pcap to test the supplied rules ?
I seem to have run into the same problem while working for fixes for another ticket ( #8459 ).
I'll sha...
10/19/2026
- JF 07:55 PM Suricata Task #9042: firewall: do not support config keyword from TD rules (8.0.x backport)
- Assigning to Jason, as he's doing the backports :P
- JF 04:48 PM Suricata Task #9041 (Resolved): firewall: do not support config keyword from TD rules
- Jason Ish wrote in #note-9:
> This wasn't completed with https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/16396.
> ...
We now ban config from TD rules in firewall mode:
- as a keyword
- as an action
From what I understand of @config@, I'd sa...