Open Information Security Foundation

11/18/2024

02:23 PM Suricata Bug #7200: Suricata[239866]: Error: byte: Extra characters following numeric value [ByteExtractString:util-byte.c:227]

Victor Julien wrote in #note-3:
> @atbohmer are you still seeing this or is this considered fixed?
Considered it ... Andre ten Bohmer

09/25/2024

01:16 PM Suricata Bug #7256: ja3: Error: ja3: Buffer should not be NULL

# suricatasc -c version
{"message": "8.0.0-dev (45eb7e488 2024-09-24)", "return": "OK"}
Problem seems to be resol... Andre ten Bohmer

09/17/2024

11:58 AM Suricata Bug #7256 (Closed): ja3: Error: ja3: Buffer should not be NULL

... Andre ten Bohmer

08/08/2024

01:41 PM Suricata Bug #7201: Thread 178 "W#21-84:00.0" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

]# suricata -V
This is Suricata version 8.0.0-dev (564a6c9a2 2024-08-07)
Running smooth again. Also modified suri... Andre ten Bohmer

08/06/2024

02:34 PM Suricata Bug #7201: Thread 178 "W#21-84:00.0" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

Probably by default:
]# grep -i ldap /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml -c
0 Andre ten Bohmer

01:50 PM Suricata Bug #7201: Thread 178 "W#21-84:00.0" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

See attached file, full script session of gdb with bt at the end. Andre ten Bohmer

01:21 PM Suricata Bug #7201: Thread 178 "W#21-84:00.0" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

ldap is not enabled due to older suricata.yaml config (so also time to update this ;) Andre ten Bohmer

11:33 AM Suricata Bug #7201: Thread 178 "W#21-84:00.0" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

Prio can be lowered: working fallback to
~]# suricatasc -c version
{"message": "7.0.6 RELEASE", "return": "OK"} Andre ten Bohmer

11:25 AM Suricata Bug #7201: Thread 178 "W#21-84:00.0" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

... Andre ten Bohmer

11:21 AM Suricata Bug #7201 (New): Thread 178 "W#21-84:00.0" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

... Andre ten Bohmer