Actions
Bug #1606
closed[ERRCODE: SC_ERR_SYSCALL(50)] - Failure when trying to get MTU via ioctl: 6
Affected Versions:
Effort:
Difficulty:
Label:
Description
On 3.0RC1 / FreeBSD 10.1 using --netmap.
Can test patches.
Actions
Added by Franco Fichtner almost 10 years ago. Updated over 9 years ago.
Description
On 3.0RC1 / FreeBSD 10.1 using --netmap.
Can test patches.
This looks like duplicate of the one here - https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1605
Franco - can you please try out the posted patch and give some feedback?
Hi Peter,
We tried the patch for #1605, this is the new output:
5/12/2015 -- 10:17:09 - <Warning> - [ERRCODE: SC_ERR_SYSCALL(50)] - Failure when trying to get MTU via ioctl for 'em1+': Device not configured (6)
Our netmap config is as follows:
netmap: - interface: default threads: auto copy-mode: ips disable-promisc: yes checksum-checks: auto - interface: em1 copy-iface: em1+ - interface: em1+ copy-iface: em1
em1+ is only a device abstraction, not an available interface in the system. Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Franco
What do you mean - a device abstraction?
Would you get the same err if you us a regular device?
em1+ is tied to em1 via netmap underneath, the OS/ifconfig itself does not know about it, it can only ever configure the actual device.
Configuring em1 yields no such error.
There are two options: (1) not configuring "+" devices, or (2) configuring the parent device instead.
If you try a different existing interface - em2 for example - would you have the same err?