Actions
Bug #4914
openFLOW_DIR_REVERSED is not handled in multiple places
Affected Versions:
Effort:
Difficulty:
low
Label:
Needs Suricata-Verify test
Description
FLOW_DIR_REVERSED may be set if a midstream flow is picked up.
However at least in the following cases, the flag is not being handled (there may be more cases).
Do we actually need this flag? i.e. is it too expensive to flip the actual values?
It seems expensive to maintain this odd case using a flag.
stream-tcp.c:StreamTcpPseudoPacketCreateDetectLogFlush
util-lua-common.c:LuaCallbackTuplePushToStackFromFlow
Steps to reproduce:¶
- create a test lua script that implements the match callback and print out the SCFlowTuple returns
- create a rule like
reject ip $HOME_NET any -> any any (msg:"Blocked"; flow:to_server,not_established; luajit:test.lua; classtype:block; sid:1; rev:1;)
- set stream.midstream=true in config
- replay the a tcp stream pcap with the first SYN packet removed
We should expect the lua script print the correct source and destination.
Build info:¶
This is Suricata version 6.0.4 RELEASE
Features: DEBUG UNITTESTS NFQ PCAP_SET_BUFF AF_PACKET HAVE_PACKET_FANOUT LIBCAP_NG LIBNET1.1 HAVE_HTP_URI_NORMALIZE_HOOK PCRE_JIT HAVE_NSS HAVE_LUA HAVE_LUAJIT HAVE_LIBJANSSON TLS TLS_C11 MAGIC RUST
SIMD support: SSE_4_2 SSE_4_1 SSE_3
Atomic intrinsics: 1 2 4 8 16 byte(s)
64-bits, Little-endian architecture
GCC version 10.2.1 20210110, C version 201112
compiled with -fstack-protector
compiled with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
L1 cache line size (CLS)=64
thread local storage method: _Thread_local
compiled with LibHTP v0.5.39, linked against LibHTP v0.5.39
Suricata Configuration:
AF_PACKET support: yes
eBPF support: yes
XDP support: yes
PF_RING support: no
NFQueue support: yes
NFLOG support: yes
IPFW support: no
Netmap support: no
DAG enabled: no
Napatech enabled: no
WinDivert enabled: no
Unix socket enabled: yes
Detection enabled: yes
Libmagic support: yes
libnss support: yes
libnspr support: yes
libjansson support: yes
hiredis support: no
hiredis async with libevent: no
Prelude support: no
PCRE jit: yes
LUA support: yes, through luajit
libluajit: yes
GeoIP2 support: yes
Non-bundled htp: no
Hyperscan support: yes
Libnet support: yes
liblz4 support: yes
HTTP2 decompression: no
Rust support: yes
Rust strict mode: no
Rust compiler path: /root/.cargo/bin/rustc
Rust compiler version: rustc 1.55.0 (c8dfcfe04 2021-09-06)
Cargo path: /root/.cargo/bin/cargo
Cargo version: cargo 1.55.0 (32da73ab1 2021-08-23)
Cargo vendor: yes
Python support: yes
Python path: /usr/bin/python3
Python distutils yes
Python yaml yes
Install suricatactl: yes
Install suricatasc: yes
Install suricata-update: not bundled
Profiling enabled: no
Profiling locks enabled: no
Plugin support (experimental): yes
Development settings:
Coccinelle / spatch: no
Unit tests enabled: yes
Debug output enabled: yes
Debug validation enabled: no
Generic build parameters:
Installation prefix: /suricata/install
Configuration directory: /etc/suricata/
Log directory: /var/log/suricata/
--prefix /suricata/install
--sysconfdir /etc
--localstatedir /var
--datarootdir /suricata/install/share
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc (exec name) / g++ (real)
GCC Protect enabled: yes
GCC march native enabled: no
GCC Profile enabled: no
Position Independent Executable enabled: no
CFLAGS -DUNITTESTS -march=broadwell -O0 -std=c11 -I${srcdir}/../rust/gen -I${srcdir}/../rust/dist
PCAP_CFLAGS -I/usr/include
SECCFLAGS -fstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Wformat-security
Updated by Philippe Antoine 4 months ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
- Label Needs Suricata-Verify test added
Do we actually need this flag? i.e. is it too expensive to flip the actual values?
We do FlowSwap in certain occasions
StreamTcpPseudoPacketCreateDetectLogFlush
Caller calls it for both directions anyways, so ok, right ?
LuaCallbackTuplePushToStackFromFlow
Does not exist anumore in 8...
So, is there still a bug ?
What is your test.lua ?
Actions