Actions
Bug #5135
open
PM
OD
DCERPC: dcerpc.iface keyword alert results differ from 5 vs 6/master
Bug #5135:
DCERPC: dcerpc.iface keyword alert results differ from 5 vs 6/master
Description
If sid 666 and 888 match there is no reason why 777 would not match.
Please see attached for comparison.
The pcap used - https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/attachments/2434
6.x and master have the problem of not generating alert on sid:777
5.x is good
Files
PA Updated by Philippe Antoine 8 months ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
alert dcerpc any any -> any any ( msg: "DCE Netlogon dcerpc.iface only"; flow: to_server, established; dcerpc.iface: 12345678-1234-abcd-ef00-01234567cffb; sid: 666; ) alert dcerpc any any -> any any ( msg: "DCE Netlogoni dcerp.iface with content added"; flow: to_server, established;content:"|78 56 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF|"; dcerpc.iface: 12345678-1234-abcd-ef00-01234567cffb; sid: 777; ) alert dcerpc any any -> any any ( msg: "DCE Netlogoni dcerp content only"; flow: to_server, established;content:"|78 56 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF|"; sid: 888; )
If sid 666 and 888 match there is no reason why 777 would not match.
Yes, there are.
The raw content may be inspected not at the same time.unixia was this fixed by your work on @TriggerRawStreamReassembly ?
Actions