Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Optimization #6510

closed

Optimization #5566: pgsql: add events

pgsql: add events (7.0.x backport)

Added by OISF Ticketbot over 1 year ago. Updated about 1 month ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
Effort:
Difficulty:
Label:
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Victor Julien over 1 year ago

  • Target version changed from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Victor Julien over 1 year ago

  • Target version changed from 7.0.4 to 7.0.5
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Victor Julien over 1 year ago

  • Target version changed from 7.0.5 to 7.0.6
Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Victor Julien about 1 year ago

  • Target version changed from 7.0.6 to 7.0.7
Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Victor Julien about 1 year ago

  • Target version changed from 7.0.7 to 7.0.8
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Victor Julien 10 months ago

  • Target version changed from 7.0.8 to 7.0.9
Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Victor Julien 7 months ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to High
Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by Victor Julien 6 months ago

  • Target version changed from 7.0.9 to 7.0.10
Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by Juliana Fajardini Reichow 5 months ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to In Review
Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by Victor Julien 4 months ago

  • Target version changed from 7.0.10 to 7.0.11
Actions
Copy link
 #11

Updated by Juliana Fajardini Reichow 3 months ago

Unsure if we still want this one, after https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/12812#issuecomment-2748363683

Will check my notes, but, tbd:
- should we have this, but disabled by default -- would this be enough?
- or should we only keep the work related to clean ups that was in that PR?

Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by Philippe Antoine about 1 month ago

  • Status changed from In Review to In Progress
Actions
Copy link
 #13

Updated by Juliana Fajardini Reichow about 1 month ago

  • Target version changed from 7.0.11 to 7.0.12
Actions
Copy link
 #14

Updated by Juliana Fajardini Reichow about 1 month ago

Thinking that maybe we should reject this backport, based on discussion here? https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/12812#issuecomment-2748363683

Actions
Copy link
 #15

Updated by Victor Julien about 1 month ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Rejected
  • Assignee deleted (Juliana Fajardini Reichow)
  • Priority changed from High to Normal
  • Target version deleted (7.0.12)

Yes, I don't think we should backport a feature this late in the cycle anymore. Ppl who need it can go to 8.

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF