Feature #5664
open"Scope" bits should have an expiration
Added by Philippe Antoine about 3 years ago. Updated about 17 hours ago.
Description
New kind of "bits" need to be implemented. These should be able to have different scope like transaction. This means that the bits should expire when a tx does
Updated by Philippe Antoine about 3 years ago
- Related to Task #4380: tracking: improvements to bits, ints, vars added
Updated by Philippe Antoine about 3 years ago
- Related to Task #5488: Suricon 2022 brainstorm added
Updated by Juliana Fajardini Reichow about 3 years ago
- Assignee changed from OISF Dev to Shivani Bhardwaj
- Target version changed from TBD to 7.0.0-rc1
Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj about 3 years ago
- Subject changed from Flowbit expiration to "Scope" bits with expiration
- Description updated (diff)
- Target version changed from 7.0.0-rc1 to 8.0.0-beta1
Updated by Juliana Fajardini Reichow over 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to Assigned
Updated by Philippe Antoine about 2 years ago
- Related to Task #6443: Suricon 2023 brainstorm added
Updated by Philippe Antoine about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #5665: rules: bidirectional transaction matching added
Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj about 2 years ago
- Subject changed from "Scope" bits with expiration to "Scope" bits should have an expiration
filebit and txbit should have an expiration.
Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #6455: txbits: support for new type of bits added
Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj about 2 years ago
- Related to Feature #6459: filebits: support for new type of bits added
Updated by Philippe Antoine over 1 year ago
Updated by Victor Julien 11 months ago
- Target version changed from 8.0.0-beta1 to 9.0.0-beta1
Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj about 2 months ago
Philippe Antoine wrote in #note-11:
I think #5665 solves most of the needs for this
So, it would be nice to get #5665 and then get feedback again about this one
@Philippe Antoine #5665 was merged sometime ago. Wdyt about this ticket now? ;)
Updated by Philippe Antoine about 2 months ago
Do people still have a concrete use case for this ?
Updated by Philippe Antoine about 17 hours ago
I think we should let some time, and then close this ticket if no new use case comes that does not currently work with bidirectional transactional rules