Feature #5664
open"Scope" bits should have an expiration
Added by Philippe Antoine over 3 years ago. Updated 9 days ago.
Description
New kind of "bits" need to be implemented. These should be able to have different scope like transaction. This means that the bits should expire when a tx does
PA Updated by Philippe Antoine over 3 years ago Actions #1
- Related to Task #4380: tracking: improvements to bits, ints, vars added
PA Updated by Philippe Antoine over 3 years ago Actions #2
- Related to Task #5488: Suricon 2022 brainstorm added
JF Updated by Juliana Fajardini Reichow over 3 years ago Actions #3
- Assignee changed from OISF Dev to Shivani Bhardwaj
- Target version changed from TBD to 7.0.0-rc1
SB Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj over 3 years ago Actions #4
- Subject changed from Flowbit expiration to "Scope" bits with expiration
- Description updated (diff)
- Target version changed from 7.0.0-rc1 to 8.0.0-beta1
JF Updated by Juliana Fajardini Reichow about 3 years ago Actions #5
- Status changed from New to Assigned
PA Updated by Philippe Antoine over 2 years ago Actions #6
- Related to Task #6443: Suricon 2023 brainstorm added
PA Updated by Philippe Antoine over 2 years ago Actions #7
- Related to Feature #5665: rules: bidirectional transaction matching added
SB Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj over 2 years ago Actions #8
- Subject changed from "Scope" bits with expiration to "Scope" bits should have an expiration
filebit and txbit should have an expiration.
SB Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj over 2 years ago Actions #9
- Related to Feature #6455: txbits: support for new type of bits added
SB Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj over 2 years ago Actions #10
- Related to Feature #6459: filebits: support for new type of bits added
PA Updated by Philippe Antoine about 2 years ago Actions #11
VJ Updated by Victor Julien over 1 year ago Actions #12
- Target version changed from 8.0.0-beta1 to 9.0.0-beta1
SB Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj 7 months ago Actions #13
Philippe Antoine wrote in #note-11:
I think #5665 solves most of the needs for this
So, it would be nice to get #5665 and then get feedback again about this one
@Philippe Antoine #5665 was merged sometime ago. Wdyt about this ticket now? ;)
PA Updated by Philippe Antoine 7 months ago Actions #14
Do people still have a concrete use case for this ?
PA Updated by Philippe Antoine 5 months ago Actions #15
I think we should let some time, and then close this ticket if no new use case comes that does not currently work with bidirectional transactional rules
SB Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj 9 days ago Actions #16
- Status changed from Assigned to Triaged
- Assignee changed from Shivani Bhardwaj to OISF Dev
- Target version deleted (
9.0.0-beta1)
Giving this up as it's unclear what needs to be done and I have not worked in the affected areas.