Suricata

Philippe Antoine wrote in #note-1:

It does not require backport, does it ?

Yeah. Probably not. The possibly false fuzz failure on the PR for 6.0.x made me put the label and this ticket was auto created.

We need a more definitive analysis than "probably not", esp since we've seen this trigger in a master6 check at least once.

No fuzz issues have been detected on master-6.0.x so far. That one run was likely an overlap of the fuzz job runs between master and master-6.0.x.
Closing for now as it seems invalid for 6.0.x.