Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #3791

closed

Assert failed in TLS due to integer underflow

Added by Jeff Lucovsky over 4 years ago. Updated about 4 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Target version:
Affected Versions:
Effort:
Difficulty:
Label:

Description

Found by oss-fuzz :
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=22564

Stack trace is :

    #8 0x51f4b0 in SSLv3ParseHandshakeType suricata/src/app-layer-ssl.c:1666:9
    #9 0x51e780 in SSLv3ParseHandshakeProtocol suricata/src/app-layer-ssl.c:1736:18
    #10 0x51cef6 in SSLv3Decode suricata/src/app-layer-ssl.c:2421:26
    #11 0x51b6b7 in SSLDecode suricata/src/app-layer-ssl.c:2608:26
    #12 0x51a9d1 in SSLParseServerRecord suricata/src/app-layer-ssl.c:2658:12
    #13 0x50da1a in AppLayerParserParse suricata/src/app-layer-parser.c:1228:30
    #14 0x4c3860 in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput suricata/src/tests/fuzz/fuzz_applayerparserparse.c:146:16


Files


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Copied from Suricata - Bug #3774: Assert failed in TLS due to integer underflowClosedPhilippe AntoineActions
Actions #1

Updated by Jeff Lucovsky over 4 years ago

  • Copied from Bug #3774: Assert failed in TLS due to integer underflow added
Actions #2

Updated by Victor Julien over 4 years ago

  • Subject changed from Assert failed in TLS dur to integer underflow to Assert failed in TLS due to integer underflow
Actions #3

Updated by Shivani Bhardwaj about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to In Review
Actions #4

Updated by Victor Julien about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from In Review to Closed
Actions #5

Updated by Victor Julien about 4 years ago

  • Private changed from Yes to No
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF