Actions
Task #5682
open
VJ
VJ
tracking: smb performance issues
Task #5682:
tracking: smb performance issues
Effort:
Difficulty:
Label:
Description
Tracking ticket for SMB performance issues reported by several people.
Targets 8, but will review all fixes for backports to 6 and 7.
VJ Updated by Victor Julien over 3 years ago
- Related to Task #5488: Suricon 2022 brainstorm added
VJ Updated by Victor Julien over 3 years ago
- Subtask #5672 added
VJ Updated by Victor Julien over 3 years ago
- Subtask #4580 added
VJ Updated by Victor Julien over 3 years ago
- Related to Optimization #4873: smb: midstream probing check affects performance added
VJ Updated by Victor Julien over 3 years ago
- Related to Bug #5753: smb: convert transaction list to vecdeque added
VJ Updated by Victor Julien over 3 years ago
- Subtask #5781 added
VJ Updated by Victor Julien over 3 years ago
- Subtask #5782 added
VJ Updated by Victor Julien about 3 years ago
- Related to Optimization #4378: file.data: split mpm per app_proto added
PA Updated by Philippe Antoine over 2 years ago
- Related to Task #6443: Suricon 2023 brainstorm added
VJ Updated by Victor Julien over 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to Assigned
VJ Updated by Victor Julien about 2 years ago
- Related to Task #6951: tracking: nfs performance issues added
JL Updated by Jeff Lucovsky almost 2 years ago
Is it possible to do SMB "lite" -- track frames but not all transactions?
Is the expense from the state tracking (name, ...)?
If you want to go deep, would smb "lite" be appropriate?
1. Determine where cost is (time, performance) first and then make decisions.
VJ Updated by Victor Julien about 1 year ago
- Target version changed from 8.0.0-beta1 to 9.0.0-beta1
Actions