Task #5682
open
tracking: smb performance issues
Added by Victor Julien about 2 years ago.
Updated 4 months ago.
Description
Tracking ticket for SMB performance issues reported by several people.
Targets 8, but will review all fixes for backports to 6 and 7.
- Related to Task #5488: Suricon 2022 brainstorm added
- Related to Bug #4873: smb: midstream probing check affects performance added
- Related to Bug #5753: smb: convert transaction list to vecdeque added
- Related to Task #6443: Suricon 2023 brainstorm added
- Status changed from New to Assigned
- Related to Task #6951: tracking: nfs performance issues added
Is it possible to do SMB "lite" -- track frames but not all transactions?
Is the expense from the state tracking (name, ...)?
If you want to go deep, would smb "lite" be appropriate?
1. Determine where cost is (time, performance) first and then make decisions.
Also available in: Atom
PDF